<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEBATE AT LOLITA BAR: &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:51:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Selections: Are Goths to the Right of Genghis Khan?</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-75342</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Selections: Are Goths to the Right of Genghis Khan?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-75342</guid>
		<description>[...] as part of my intro comments at last month&#8217;s Debate at Lolita Bar on the question &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?&#8221; &#8212; taken from Herwig Wolfram&#8217;s History of the Goths (a 1980 book I can&#8217;t really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as part of my intro comments at last month&#8217;s Debate at Lolita Bar on the question &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?&#8221; &#8212; taken from Herwig Wolfram&#8217;s History of the Goths (a 1980 book I can&#8217;t really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DEBATE AUDIO: Is Christianity for Wimps?</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-75075</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DEBATE AUDIO: Is Christianity for Wimps?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-75075</guid>
		<description>[...] courtesy of Michel Evanchik, you can download the first four of the twelve audio clips from our debate two weeks ago between Richard Spencer and Helen Rittelmeyer on the question &#8220;Is Christi... &#8212; beginning with me telling an icebreaking bear joke I got from my skeptic boss&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] courtesy of Michel Evanchik, you can download the first four of the twelve audio clips from our debate two weeks ago between Richard Spencer and Helen Rittelmeyer on the question &#8220;Is Christi&#8230; &#8212; beginning with me telling an icebreaking bear joke I got from my skeptic boss&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Christianity vs. Cupcakes</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-75056</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Christianity vs. Cupcakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-75056</guid>
		<description>[...] about politics), note that tomorrow should bring a posting of audio files from the former (our  March 3 bout on the question &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?”) and another live iteration of the latter (6:30pm-on at Merchants NY East bar-restaurant, 62nd and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about politics), note that tomorrow should bring a posting of audio files from the former (our  March 3 bout on the question &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?”) and another live iteration of the latter (6:30pm-on at Merchants NY East bar-restaurant, 62nd and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alice, Neo, Jesus, and You</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-74971</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alice, Neo, Jesus, and You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-74971</guid>
		<description>[...] film 7) if only to cap this religious-discussion-themed week, (which also included our fine, feisty Debate at Lolita Bar between Richard Spencer and Helen Rittelmeyer, in which a crowd with admittedly few Christians concluded, by not too wide a margin, that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] film 7) if only to cap this religious-discussion-themed week, (which also included our fine, feisty Debate at Lolita Bar between Richard Spencer and Helen Rittelmeyer, in which a crowd with admittedly few Christians concluded, by not too wide a margin, that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kick-Ass and Brutally Honest</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-74933</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kick-Ass and Brutally Honest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-74933</guid>
		<description>[...] our big Debate at Lolita Bar on the question &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?&#8221; &#8212; and one question sure to arise is whether wimps are, in fact, bad. Take our level of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our big Debate at Lolita Bar on the question &#8220;Is Christianity for Wimps?&#8221; &#8212; and one question sure to arise is whether wimps are, in fact, bad. Take our level of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In Wonderland, In the Loop, In King Arthur&#8217;s Day</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-74918</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In Wonderland, In the Loop, In King Arthur&#8217;s Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-74918</guid>
		<description>[...] I saw Alice in Wonderland, about which I am sworn to secrecy for now, but I will just say that from the posters alone you can glean that Helena Bonham-Carter&#8217;s character has a sinister grin and a giant forehead, if you&#8217;re into that (and if you are, that&#8217;s one more weird side topic we can discuss at tomorrow night&#8217;s Debate at Lolita Bar...). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I saw Alice in Wonderland, about which I am sworn to secrecy for now, but I will just say that from the posters alone you can glean that Helena Bonham-Carter&#8217;s character has a sinister grin and a giant forehead, if you&#8217;re into that (and if you are, that&#8217;s one more weird side topic we can discuss at tomorrow night&#8217;s Debate at Lolita Bar&#8230;). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali T. Kokmen</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-74912</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali T. Kokmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-74912</guid>
		<description>For the cause, Gawker on New York Times trend stories:

http://gawker.com/5467798/how-to-destroy-a-perfectly-good-fake-trend-story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the cause, Gawker on New York Times trend stories:</p>
<p><a href="http://gawker.com/5467798/how-to-destroy-a-perfectly-good-fake-trend-story" rel="nofollow">http://gawker.com/5467798/how-to-destroy-a-perfectly-good-fake-trend-story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-74905</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-74905</guid>
		<description>My job has pretty much convinced me that all news stories are fake trend stories, especially the ones involving statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My job has pretty much convinced me that all news stories are fake trend stories, especially the ones involving statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2010/03/01/debate-at-lolita-bar-is-christianity-for-wimps/comment-page-1/#comment-74903</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/?p=1874#comment-74903</guid>
		<description>Do the editors of the New York Times ever tire of running fake trend news stories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the editors of the New York Times ever tire of running fake trend news stories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
