<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barbie Wins in the End</title>
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob T. Levy</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/#comment-19018</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/#comment-19018</guid>
					<description>Inefficiencies have opportunity costs-- the wasteful way of doing something consumes resources that could have gone into something else.  Except in the shortest of short terms, paying people to dig ditches and other people to fill them in again is nothing but destructive for an economy-- and a $10,000 solution to a $10 problem is no different.

The good news is that discovering more efficient ways to do the same thing other people were already doing is an excellent route to entrepreneurial success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inefficiencies have opportunity costs&#8211; the wasteful way of doing something consumes resources that could have gone into something else.  Except in the shortest of short terms, paying people to dig ditches and other people to fill them in again is nothing but destructive for an economy&#8211; and a $10,000 solution to a $10 problem is no different.</p>
<p>The good news is that discovering more efficient ways to do the same thing other people were already doing is an excellent route to entrepreneurial success.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/#comment-18972</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/#comment-18972</guid>
					<description>I think you're defining capitalism too narrowly.  It includes appeals to purchase things (which some people might well need if they have goals that involve, say, having a 1% edge over other professional bass fishermen or something) and advice to do things other ways.

The only thing I'd consider truly anti-capitalist is a law code that prevents them making such decisions (by taxing and regulating them, or by subsidizing the things they're "supposed" to want according to experts or a democratic majority and its representatives).

A best-selling book counseling simplicity and asceticism would certainly seem consistent with capitalism as properly defined -- and so would a poorly-selling one.

And this is an important point, one perhaps oft misunderstood, so I thought it worth replying in a fairly serious fashion.  Put another way: your hippie commune only threatens my capitalist system if you seize land for it via eminent domain or start trying to "legislate" the behavior of neighbors.  Good neighbors don't legislate, and decent human beings don't govern each other.  What they buy and sell (or don't) is their own business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re defining capitalism too narrowly.  It includes appeals to purchase things (which some people might well need if they have goals that involve, say, having a 1% edge over other professional bass fishermen or something) and advice to do things other ways.</p>
<p>The only thing I&#8217;d consider truly anti-capitalist is a law code that prevents them making such decisions (by taxing and regulating them, or by subsidizing the things they&#8217;re &#8220;supposed&#8221; to want according to experts or a democratic majority and its representatives).</p>
<p>A best-selling book counseling simplicity and asceticism would certainly seem consistent with capitalism as properly defined &#8212; and so would a poorly-selling one.</p>
<p>And this is an important point, one perhaps oft misunderstood, so I thought it worth replying in a fairly serious fashion.  Put another way: your hippie commune only threatens my capitalist system if you seize land for it via eminent domain or start trying to &#8220;legislate&#8221; the behavior of neighbors.  Good neighbors don&#8217;t legislate, and decent human beings don&#8217;t govern each other.  What they buy and sell (or don&#8217;t) is their own business.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/#comment-18967</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/13/barbie-wins-in-the-end/#comment-18967</guid>
					<description>I'm going to have to label this post as slightly (only slightly - I'm not impugning your integrity here) anti-capitalism. Because isn't the engine of capitalism people buying a bunch of stuff they don't really need? Of course part of it is people buying things they do need, but that's not where full employment comes from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to label this post as slightly (only slightly - I&#8217;m not impugning your integrity here) anti-capitalism. Because isn&#8217;t the engine of capitalism people buying a bunch of stuff they don&#8217;t really need? Of course part of it is people buying things they do need, but that&#8217;s not where full employment comes from.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
