<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: She Likes Machine Guns, Capitalism&#8230;and Pot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:51:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18632</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18632</guid>
		<description>Sounds like she&#039;s outgrown those issues, though, which is good -- and the root problem is of course the existence of public libraries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like she&#8217;s outgrown those issues, though, which is good &#8212; and the root problem is of course the existence of public libraries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C.</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18628</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18628</guid>
		<description>That damn liberal media! Finding out facts instead of just leaving her alone. How long before YouTube has a &quot;Leave Sarah Alone!&quot; video?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That damn liberal media! Finding out facts instead of just leaving her alone. How long before YouTube has a &#8220;Leave Sarah Alone!&#8221; video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18625</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18625</guid>
		<description>A real &quot;hot librarian&quot; type would never &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837918,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;[ask] the library how she could go about banning books&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A real &#8220;hot librarian&#8221; type would never <a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837918,00.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;[ask] the library how she could go about banning books&#8221;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc S.</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18382</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18382</guid>
		<description>(Leaving aside question of how to weigh the social consequences of unwanted pregnancies against economic drag imposed by taxation &amp; government spending) 
 If only Republicans hewed more to the traditional definition of &quot;fiscal conservatism&quot; - don&#039;t spend a lot on government solutions to social problems, and don&#039;t spend more than you take in - I&#039;d feel more neutral about the social issues/economic policy tradeoffs  between Obama &amp; McCain.
But since the agenda is now to push for tax cuts without corresponding spending cuts, or debt-financed spending increases (e.g., Iraq war), the Repubs now seem to be pretty far to the negative side of the utility spectrum. If the John McCain of 2001 or 2003, who opposed the Bush tax cuts in favor of paying down of the national debt, were running, maybe it would be an interesting choice.  But given how much he’s “sold outâ€, I figure the amount of damage Obama could do through increased social spending pales in comparison to the amount of debt we&#039;d incur from expanded military action under McCain, whether paid through higher taxes now (unlikely, but painful) or further deficit spending (more likely, and more painful).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Leaving aside question of how to weigh the social consequences of unwanted pregnancies against economic drag imposed by taxation &amp; government spending)<br />
 If only Republicans hewed more to the traditional definition of &#8220;fiscal conservatism&#8221; &#8211; don&#8217;t spend a lot on government solutions to social problems, and don&#8217;t spend more than you take in &#8211; I&#8217;d feel more neutral about the social issues/economic policy tradeoffs  between Obama &amp; McCain.<br />
But since the agenda is now to push for tax cuts without corresponding spending cuts, or debt-financed spending increases (e.g., Iraq war), the Repubs now seem to be pretty far to the negative side of the utility spectrum. If the John McCain of 2001 or 2003, who opposed the Bush tax cuts in favor of paying down of the national debt, were running, maybe it would be an interesting choice.  But given how much he’s “sold outâ€, I figure the amount of damage Obama could do through increased social spending pales in comparison to the amount of debt we&#8217;d incur from expanded military action under McCain, whether paid through higher taxes now (unlikely, but painful) or further deficit spending (more likely, and more painful).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C.</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18377</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18377</guid>
		<description>Think an episode of 30 Rock will pick up on the similarity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think an episode of 30 Rock will pick up on the similarity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18374</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18374</guid>
		<description>I see that one non-Puritanical catchphrase has entered the lexicon thanks to Palin, by the way, for good or ill: VPILF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that one non-Puritanical catchphrase has entered the lexicon thanks to Palin, by the way, for good or ill: VPILF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C.</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18363</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18363</guid>
		<description>You mean more likely chance than Obama to take over? Has the left despaired so quickly? Oh, you mean more likely than Biden. OK, I hear you.&gt;&gt;

I&#039;m certainly not on the left, more like centrist...though I am a &quot;Moral relativist&quot; to those of a religious ilk. :) I&#039;ve heard about the Obama/infantcide thing, but to be honest, haven&#039;t paid too much attention to it, because it seems like a Fox News story taken out of context. I just think picking Palin shows a lack of judgement on McCain&#039;s part and a pandering to the few women who are still POed about Clinton not being the choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean more likely chance than Obama to take over? Has the left despaired so quickly? Oh, you mean more likely than Biden. OK, I hear you.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not on the left, more like centrist&#8230;though I am a &#8220;Moral relativist&#8221; to those of a religious ilk. :) I&#8217;ve heard about the Obama/infantcide thing, but to be honest, haven&#8217;t paid too much attention to it, because it seems like a Fox News story taken out of context. I just think picking Palin shows a lack of judgement on McCain&#8217;s part and a pandering to the few women who are still POed about Clinton not being the choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18359</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18359</guid>
		<description>You mean more likely chance than Obama to take over?  Has the left despaired so quickly?  Oh, you mean more likely than Biden.  OK, I hear you.

Well, I will just say -- very broadly speaking -- that while I am an atheist and on the abortion issue a moderate, I think the government spends 98% of its time doing things completely unrelated to religion one way or the other, thus making me more concerned about econ and the like.  I wouldn&#039;t rule out Palin on her pro-life views alone, but then, neither would I rule out Obama on his radically pro-choice abortion views, either (and it might reasonably -- and without reference to religion -- be argued that bordering on infanticide is more troubling than bordering on thinking a zygote&#039;s a person, insane as I regard both positions as being).

Or to put it another way: bad econ views hurt the economy, but stupidity about evolution doesn&#039;t actually stop evolution, so that kind of insanity I tend to regard as the lesser of two evils (nutty as it is to believe, say, that national ID cards are the Mark of the Beast, as one interviewee on Reason&#039;s blog suggests she may believe).

Until Virginia Postrel runs for president, they&#039;re all mixtures of good and bad qualities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean more likely chance than Obama to take over?  Has the left despaired so quickly?  Oh, you mean more likely than Biden.  OK, I hear you.</p>
<p>Well, I will just say &#8212; very broadly speaking &#8212; that while I am an atheist and on the abortion issue a moderate, I think the government spends 98% of its time doing things completely unrelated to religion one way or the other, thus making me more concerned about econ and the like.  I wouldn&#8217;t rule out Palin on her pro-life views alone, but then, neither would I rule out Obama on his radically pro-choice abortion views, either (and it might reasonably &#8212; and without reference to religion &#8212; be argued that bordering on infanticide is more troubling than bordering on thinking a zygote&#8217;s a person, insane as I regard both positions as being).</p>
<p>Or to put it another way: bad econ views hurt the economy, but stupidity about evolution doesn&#8217;t actually stop evolution, so that kind of insanity I tend to regard as the lesser of two evils (nutty as it is to believe, say, that national ID cards are the Mark of the Beast, as one interviewee on Reason&#8217;s blog suggests she may believe).</p>
<p>Until Virginia Postrel runs for president, they&#8217;re all mixtures of good and bad qualities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C.</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-18356</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/09/03/she-likes-machine-guns-capitalismand-pot/#comment-18356</guid>
		<description>Sounds perfect....except for being a ultra-right-to-lifer  who believes creationism should be taught in schools. And while the GOP harps on Obama&#039;s lack of experience, he&#039;s an elder statesman compared to Palin, who has a more likely chance of eventually having to take over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds perfect&#8230;.except for being a ultra-right-to-lifer  who believes creationism should be taught in schools. And while the GOP harps on Obama&#8217;s lack of experience, he&#8217;s an elder statesman compared to Palin, who has a more likely chance of eventually having to take over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
