<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEBATE AT LOLITA BAR: What Do the Primary Results So Far Mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:43:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cohen</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-10554</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10554</guid>
		<description>Romney, Todd? You can&#039;t be serious. 

Paul has my vote. His willingness to profit from racist propaganda written by LR in a smattering of articles published over the course of decades is objectionable, surely, but his personal rhetoric and his voting record have earned him my vote. Moreover, he takes responsibility for and apologizes for any intolerant messages in his communications. 

I don&#039;t hear Romney apologizing for what he&#039;d done with health care in MA. He&#039;s actually proud of captaining a government invasion of health care. And McCain is a war monger and fiscal pragmatist.

Don&#039;t let &quot;pretty damn great&quot; be a casualty of &quot;perfection.&quot;  
Vote for Paul, Todd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney, Todd? You can&#8217;t be serious. </p>
<p>Paul has my vote. His willingness to profit from racist propaganda written by LR in a smattering of articles published over the course of decades is objectionable, surely, but his personal rhetoric and his voting record have earned him my vote. Moreover, he takes responsibility for and apologizes for any intolerant messages in his communications. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hear Romney apologizing for what he&#8217;d done with health care in MA. He&#8217;s actually proud of captaining a government invasion of health care. And McCain is a war monger and fiscal pragmatist.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let &#8220;pretty damn great&#8221; be a casualty of &#8220;perfection.&#8221;<br />
Vote for Paul, Todd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-10505</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10505</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Particularly with Giuliani reportedly dropping out, the New York alternative to rubber-stamping McCain at this point, then, is: Romney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Particularly with Giuliani reportedly dropping out, the New York alternative to rubber-stamping McCain at this point, then, is: Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bates</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10503</guid>
		<description>With a winner-take-all primary, the best any limited-government, pro-national-sovereignty voter can do is to vote for the candidate with the best chance of beating McCain in that state, in hopes of denying him a majority of delegates at the convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a winner-take-all primary, the best any limited-government, pro-national-sovereignty voter can do is to vote for the candidate with the best chance of beating McCain in that state, in hopes of denying him a majority of delegates at the convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
