<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEBATE AT LOLITA BAR: What Do the Primary Results So Far Mean?</title>
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Adam Cohen</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10554</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10554</guid>
					<description>Romney, Todd? You can't be serious. 

Paul has my vote. His willingness to profit from racist propaganda written by LR in a smattering of articles published over the course of decades is objectionable, surely, but his personal rhetoric and his voting record have earned him my vote. Moreover, he takes responsibility for and apologizes for any intolerant messages in his communications. 

I don't hear Romney apologizing for what he'd done with health care in MA. He's actually proud of captaining a government invasion of health care. And McCain is a war monger and fiscal pragmatist.

Don't let "pretty damn great" be a casualty of "perfection."  
Vote for Paul, Todd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney, Todd? You can&#8217;t be serious. </p>
<p>Paul has my vote. His willingness to profit from racist propaganda written by LR in a smattering of articles published over the course of decades is objectionable, surely, but his personal rhetoric and his voting record have earned him my vote. Moreover, he takes responsibility for and apologizes for any intolerant messages in his communications. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hear Romney apologizing for what he&#8217;d done with health care in MA. He&#8217;s actually proud of captaining a government invasion of health care. And McCain is a war monger and fiscal pragmatist.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let &#8220;pretty damn great&#8221; be a casualty of &#8220;perfection.&#8221;<br />
Vote for Paul, Todd.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10505</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10505</guid>
					<description>Yep.  Particularly with Giuliani reportedly dropping out, the New York alternative to rubber-stamping McCain at this point, then, is: Romney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Particularly with Giuliani reportedly dropping out, the New York alternative to rubber-stamping McCain at this point, then, is: Romney.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Bates</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10503</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2008/01/30/debate-at-lolita-bar-what-do-the-primary-results-so-far-mean/#comment-10503</guid>
					<description>With a winner-take-all primary, the best any limited-government, pro-national-sovereignty voter can do is to vote for the candidate with the best chance of beating McCain in that state, in hopes of denying him a majority of delegates at the convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a winner-take-all primary, the best any limited-government, pro-national-sovereignty voter can do is to vote for the candidate with the best chance of beating McCain in that state, in hopes of denying him a majority of delegates at the convention.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
