<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro-Journal: The Palpably Weirder 90s Begin</title>
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob T. Levy</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11621</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11621</guid>
					<description>... whereas I was an remain pretty pleased with Brown teaching-- even moreso after seeing more colleges.  I had one terrible prof-- I knew he was going to be terrible, but really wanted to take a class in the subject matter.  And then I never did that again.  I had one with whom I really didn't click in a seminar, and the class made me cranky all the time.  But I had five great classroom teachers-- only one of whom assigned his own work, but then, if you're Gordon Wood and you're teaching American Revolution, you really *need* to assign your own work-- from three of whom I took more than one class, plus a mediocre teacher who was a wonderful intellectual and I loved the class even though he wasn't a very good lecturer.  That all adds up to most of my poli sci and history courses, which were most of my courses.  

Good college teaching is *hard*, but I got enough of it at Brown to feel inspired to want to do it myself-- albeit teaching a lot more Great Books than I got in most Brown classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; whereas I was an remain pretty pleased with Brown teaching&#8211; even moreso after seeing more colleges.  I had one terrible prof&#8211; I knew he was going to be terrible, but really wanted to take a class in the subject matter.  And then I never did that again.  I had one with whom I really didn&#8217;t click in a seminar, and the class made me cranky all the time.  But I had five great classroom teachers&#8211; only one of whom assigned his own work, but then, if you&#8217;re Gordon Wood and you&#8217;re teaching American Revolution, you really *need* to assign your own work&#8211; from three of whom I took more than one class, plus a mediocre teacher who was a wonderful intellectual and I loved the class even though he wasn&#8217;t a very good lecturer.  That all adds up to most of my poli sci and history courses, which were most of my courses.  </p>
<p>Good college teaching is *hard*, but I got enough of it at Brown to feel inspired to want to do it myself&#8211; albeit teaching a lot more Great Books than I got in most Brown classes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11574</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11574</guid>
					<description>Point taken about your Philosophy professor, Todd. You were lucky. At the risk of sounding ungrateful or bitter (I did actually learn a lot at Brown, but much of it wasn't in the classroom, sadly), I have to say that overall I was not that impressed with my professors, the majority of whom were so ego-driven that even if they offered a few great works in their classes, it was usually as a vehicle to force down your throat some work of their own (what an easy way to boost book sales!) in what often seemed like a very transparent prioritizing of career and reputation over actually doing their job: educating students. But I am sure this is in no way unique to Brown, it was just a bit disappointing to me, as I had arrived there with very high expectations.

That said, I did have a few very good professors, and I did manage to read some Great books, despite the teachers' best attempts to mangle them (Ulysses comes to mind in a required comp lit literary theory course). Like Jacob, even though it wasn't for my major, I took a Tolstoy class, where I managed to cross War and Peace off my list, as well as Anna Karenina (which I have reread many times since and still remains a favorite), and his shorter works. But most of the biggies or classics that I have read have been on my own as well, Brown just wasn't the place to acquire that kind of an education.

I too just cannot remember quotes from books, even from the Kurt Vonnegut I've been addicted to for the last 6 months, and which are infinitely quotable. But isn't this kind of quoting really just party tricks, meant to impress or perhaps intimidate others? In any case, I am generally far less impressed with whether someone can accurately quote someone else, than I am with whether they can come up with an original statement of some relevance and truth. (that's my excuse!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken about your Philosophy professor, Todd. You were lucky. At the risk of sounding ungrateful or bitter (I did actually learn a lot at Brown, but much of it wasn&#8217;t in the classroom, sadly), I have to say that overall I was not that impressed with my professors, the majority of whom were so ego-driven that even if they offered a few great works in their classes, it was usually as a vehicle to force down your throat some work of their own (what an easy way to boost book sales!) in what often seemed like a very transparent prioritizing of career and reputation over actually doing their job: educating students. But I am sure this is in no way unique to Brown, it was just a bit disappointing to me, as I had arrived there with very high expectations.</p>
<p>That said, I did have a few very good professors, and I did manage to read some Great books, despite the teachers&#8217; best attempts to mangle them (Ulysses comes to mind in a required comp lit literary theory course). Like Jacob, even though it wasn&#8217;t for my major, I took a Tolstoy class, where I managed to cross War and Peace off my list, as well as Anna Karenina (which I have reread many times since and still remains a favorite), and his shorter works. But most of the biggies or classics that I have read have been on my own as well, Brown just wasn&#8217;t the place to acquire that kind of an education.</p>
<p>I too just cannot remember quotes from books, even from the Kurt Vonnegut I&#8217;ve been addicted to for the last 6 months, and which are infinitely quotable. But isn&#8217;t this kind of quoting really just party tricks, meant to impress or perhaps intimidate others? In any case, I am generally far less impressed with whether someone can accurately quote someone else, than I am with whether they can come up with an original statement of some relevance and truth. (that&#8217;s my excuse!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11563</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11563</guid>
					<description>I was consciously motivated in part by a desire to make up for Brown's lack of a Great Books emphasis to seek out courses, both for my English major and my Philosophy major, that included such works, and when that didn't quite do it, I added Gluck's three-part course on European Intellectual History, which was where I read Hegel, Marx, Darwin, and other biggies.  

I still haven't been voracious enough that I'd ever claim to be "well-read," though, and I think one of my weak areas is Continental fiction -- you know, all those guys with names like Flaubert and Hodelet and Baubaubuie and so forth.  

And though I've read some of the major Greek suspects, I sometimes feel like I must've missed something, since I am not moved to memorize or quote them as often as T.S. Eliot or William F. Buckley types do.  I am struck mute on the topic, like...Erebeusus...weeping over Phelynobone...and an...urn...or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was consciously motivated in part by a desire to make up for Brown&#8217;s lack of a Great Books emphasis to seek out courses, both for my English major and my Philosophy major, that included such works, and when that didn&#8217;t quite do it, I added Gluck&#8217;s three-part course on European Intellectual History, which was where I read Hegel, Marx, Darwin, and other biggies.  </p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t been voracious enough that I&#8217;d ever claim to be &#8220;well-read,&#8221; though, and I think one of my weak areas is Continental fiction &#8212; you know, all those guys with names like Flaubert and Hodelet and Baubaubuie and so forth.  </p>
<p>And though I&#8217;ve read some of the major Greek suspects, I sometimes feel like I must&#8217;ve missed something, since I am not moved to memorize or quote them as often as T.S. Eliot or William F. Buckley types do.  I am struck mute on the topic, like&#8230;Erebeusus&#8230;weeping over Phelynobone&#8230;and an&#8230;urn&#8230;or something.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob T. Levy</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11557</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11557</guid>
					<description>Naomi, what a great story!

From time to time I regret not having taken more college English classes or comp lit classes, because I feel so woefully underread.  I took one class on American literature for the sole purpose of being made to read Moby Dick; why didn't I do more of that kind of thing?  (I'm trying to make it a habit to read at least one major classic I hadn't read before per year-- but life's not long enough to ever catch up.)  But then I remember all the tales form my friends who actually took such classes at Brown, and think that I was better served taking poli sci.

I wonder how much course-selection affected Todd's and my divergent attitudes toward the place?  

I do remember the existence of the literary journal.  But I've been on college campuses for almost 20 years straight now.  There's always a literary journal; and they're indistinguishable from one another.  I think as a self-defense mechanism my brain can't remember the names of any of them-- even the one that's still piled up in my building today. 

Oddly, the daily newspapers are much less interchangeable.  And of course so are the humor publications; I've never seen anything at all like the Film Bulletin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naomi, what a great story!</p>
<p>From time to time I regret not having taken more college English classes or comp lit classes, because I feel so woefully underread.  I took one class on American literature for the sole purpose of being made to read Moby Dick; why didn&#8217;t I do more of that kind of thing?  (I&#8217;m trying to make it a habit to read at least one major classic I hadn&#8217;t read before per year&#8211; but life&#8217;s not long enough to ever catch up.)  But then I remember all the tales form my friends who actually took such classes at Brown, and think that I was better served taking poli sci.</p>
<p>I wonder how much course-selection affected Todd&#8217;s and my divergent attitudes toward the place?  </p>
<p>I do remember the existence of the literary journal.  But I&#8217;ve been on college campuses for almost 20 years straight now.  There&#8217;s always a literary journal; and they&#8217;re indistinguishable from one another.  I think as a self-defense mechanism my brain can&#8217;t remember the names of any of them&#8211; even the one that&#8217;s still piled up in my building today. </p>
<p>Oddly, the daily newspapers are much less interchangeable.  And of course so are the humor publications; I&#8217;ve never seen anything at all like the Film Bulletin&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11544</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11544</guid>
					<description>Three more things I should add: 

1. She may seem cute and harmless now, but I have it on good authority that Lisa Loeb snottily asked fellow Brown student Reid Mihalko, now a sensitive organizer of Cuddle Parties, what he as a football player could really have to add to their shared art class discussions -- but we've all grown up a lot since then.  

2. I should say that while I fled that one day of the philosophy class, Chisholm really was a giant of the field and I'm honored to have learned from him -- an acolyte of Bertrand Russell, who was in turn the godson, bizarrely enough, of ur-libertarian John Stuart Mill.  

3. If anyone reading this wants to read _another_ intersection of the Retro-Journal with a They Might Be Giants concert, one is recounted in my most recent entry, as I write this, at this URL: 

http://toddseavey.com/2008/02/08/retro-journal-tmbg-uk-dc-and-abc-late-1995/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three more things I should add: </p>
<p>1. She may seem cute and harmless now, but I have it on good authority that Lisa Loeb snottily asked fellow Brown student Reid Mihalko, now a sensitive organizer of Cuddle Parties, what he as a football player could really have to add to their shared art class discussions &#8212; but we&#8217;ve all grown up a lot since then.  </p>
<p>2. I should say that while I fled that one day of the philosophy class, Chisholm really was a giant of the field and I&#8217;m honored to have learned from him &#8212; an acolyte of Bertrand Russell, who was in turn the godson, bizarrely enough, of ur-libertarian John Stuart Mill.  </p>
<p>3. If anyone reading this wants to read _another_ intersection of the Retro-Journal with a They Might Be Giants concert, one is recounted in my most recent entry, as I write this, at this URL: </p>
<p><a href="http://toddseavey.com/2008/02/08/retro-journal-tmbg-uk-dc-and-abc-late-1995/" rel="nofollow">http://toddseavey.com/2008/02/08/retro-journal-tmbg-uk-dc-and-abc-late-1995/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11542</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11542</guid>
					<description>Well it's all true, though I'm not sure what it says about either of us when cynicism and outright mockery become heroics.

A couple of other things you mentioned that resonated: 

1) Your fleeing from the inane philosophy class, yet writing a paper on it. I had the same reaction in some required semiotics classes for my comp lit major. Maybe it makes me a philistine, but I couldn't stand analyzing poetry or film as a "container", etc. I did learn the jargon well enough to get through the courses and write numerous papers about the stuff, but quickly forgot it afterwards, as well as any desire to continue in academia.

2) What was up with the mosh pit at the They Might Be Giants concerts??? I got some guy's boot in my face at one of them, and consequently my glasses smashed, without which I couldn't see two feet in front of me. I was very disoriented about music and humans for quite awhile after that.

Thanks for the fun entry, I enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s all true, though I&#8217;m not sure what it says about either of us when cynicism and outright mockery become heroics.</p>
<p>A couple of other things you mentioned that resonated: </p>
<p>1) Your fleeing from the inane philosophy class, yet writing a paper on it. I had the same reaction in some required semiotics classes for my comp lit major. Maybe it makes me a philistine, but I couldn&#8217;t stand analyzing poetry or film as a &#8220;container&#8221;, etc. I did learn the jargon well enough to get through the courses and write numerous papers about the stuff, but quickly forgot it afterwards, as well as any desire to continue in academia.</p>
<p>2) What was up with the mosh pit at the They Might Be Giants concerts??? I got some guy&#8217;s boot in my face at one of them, and consequently my glasses smashed, without which I couldn&#8217;t see two feet in front of me. I was very disoriented about music and humans for quite awhile after that.</p>
<p>Thanks for the fun entry, I enjoyed it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11500</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11500</guid>
					<description>I had completely forgotten about that!  Who knows what else I've let slip away?  Thanks for the reminder -- and long is fine, especially when you say nice things about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had completely forgotten about that!  Who knows what else I&#8217;ve let slip away?  Thanks for the reminder &#8212; and long is fine, especially when you say nice things about me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11480</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-11480</guid>
					<description>Since I have been a topic of discussion here (and a rather revelatory one at that, thanks Mike!), I figured I would throw in my two pennies. This was one of the more interesting references to me that I found while egotistically googling my name, which I sadly do about every five years (come on, you do too, admit it). So, thanks Todd, for the Flaming Carrot credit, and an opener too! I'm so pleased to know that my passing of that torch was an influential and shaping act in your life... still have those old copies on my shelves, and I can confirm that they did indeed come from Mike May, best thing that he ever gave me (that was for outing my sexual history, mike... and why am I not surprised to see your name on this blog?). Oh, and thanks for keeping track of my resume, very decent and attentive of you, Todd. Hi Jacob! OK, now that salutations and thank yous are taken care of, here's my contribution to your memoir of that odd moment in time at Brown, and a memory that I cherish.

Do you remember The Waistcoat of Skin??? For the benefit of your readers I will elaborate. Todd and I both managed, amazingly, to write our way into a small, rather exclusive creative writing seminar fall semester of '89 (my first at Brown). This was how I got to know the odd loner junior who lived across the hall from me in my freshman dorm (that would be Todd). As one who became disenchanted rather quickly with all the self-absorbed intellectual and artistic snobbery and bullshit that I encountered at every turn at Brown, I found myself an easy ally in Todd, who shared my bewilderment at the cast of characters and the stories that they produced in that seminar, and I thoroughly enjoyed exchanging impressions with him every week on the latest reading material we had received to critique. Critique! What horror! If you have seen Todd Solondz's Storytelling (damn, he already made a film about it!), you will have some idea of what a nightmare and joke a creative writing seminar can be, everyone going around in a circle and giving their invaluable opinion of what someone in the class has created, whether it is warranted or not. Pretty much all the stories we read were crap (and I willlingly include my own here), and all the opinions we heard were crap, but there was one story that stood out, well, two, actually, and if you will humor me and read on, you'll see why.

I think we were eighteen, maybe twenty total in the class, and we sat around one large table in a small classroom. But one guy in the class (unlike Todd, I don't remember anyone's names, which is probably best) sat apart from the rest of us, every class, even if there was room at the table, he sat in a seat against a far wall. He never said a word, never offered an opinion on any of the stories, he hardly looked like he was even listening. This was highly unusual behavior at Brown, particularly in a small upper class seminar. So, when the time finally came to read a story by him, Todd and I were naturally very curious. His story was titled "The Waistcoat of Skin," and it was about a man (or a woman, my memory sucks) who stumbles into some odd shop in some odd town in his travels, and finds some magnetically attractive vest (aka waistcoat...) hanging there, and, at the ominously eager urging of the shopkeeper, decides to try on the incredibly soft, supple, inviting piece of clothing... which then proceeds to devour him, merging him into the presumably many many others that have tried on the fatal waistcoat before him. Of course the shopkeeper then hangs the carnivorous waistcoat back up for the next unsuspecting customer to be ensnared by.

This was the most refreshing, delightful, zany, humorous (though I'm not sure it was meant to be) piece we had read, and, in true form, the author had absolutely nothing to say for himself. Of course no-one else in the class liked it, besides Todd and myself, and if memory serves, I think I avoided sitting across from you Todd so as not to giggle through the entire 2 hours or whatever, though I'm sure I cracked a few times.

But that guy, whoever he is, wherever he is, was not the true hero of the class. Todd was. When it came time for him to hand in a story towards the end of the semester, we had read a good number already, including a piece written by the grad student teacher of the seminar that was published in the literary journal (the name of which I of course cannot recall... Todd? Jacob?), which was some indecipherable nonsense in all italics (these are my hands, these are my feet, these are my shoes, these are my socks... and so on) alternating with some odd conversations in plain text that went nowhere. Confirmed my suspicion that the teacher was no authority on creative writing, at least not the kind that I was interested in. So Todd's "story" was a mix of highlights of all the semester's "best" pieces, with obvious references to their style and plot (there was also something about RFK and Marilyn Monroe in there, I think, unless that was in a different story you wrote), and the best was, about the middle of the story, it even broke into italics: these are my hands, these are my feet, this is my shirt, this is my toothbrush (ok, I don't remember exactly what he wrote, but you get the idea). I already knew from the Film Bulletin that Todd had iron-clad balls, but this was beyond anything I could have hoped for. As you can probably imagine, the class was not very happy, I don't really remember the responses to the piece, I think I was too busy trying to contain my mirth. But I do remember that the teacher was NOT impressed. I was.

I guess this was more than two pennies worth of contribution to your nostalgic look at that year, Todd, but I just couldn't resist. I know that sharing that class with you was a highlight for me during that year (hell, during my four years at Brown), and brings a smile to my face to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I have been a topic of discussion here (and a rather revelatory one at that, thanks Mike!), I figured I would throw in my two pennies. This was one of the more interesting references to me that I found while egotistically googling my name, which I sadly do about every five years (come on, you do too, admit it). So, thanks Todd, for the Flaming Carrot credit, and an opener too! I&#8217;m so pleased to know that my passing of that torch was an influential and shaping act in your life&#8230; still have those old copies on my shelves, and I can confirm that they did indeed come from Mike May, best thing that he ever gave me (that was for outing my sexual history, mike&#8230; and why am I not surprised to see your name on this blog?). Oh, and thanks for keeping track of my resume, very decent and attentive of you, Todd. Hi Jacob! OK, now that salutations and thank yous are taken care of, here&#8217;s my contribution to your memoir of that odd moment in time at Brown, and a memory that I cherish.</p>
<p>Do you remember The Waistcoat of Skin??? For the benefit of your readers I will elaborate. Todd and I both managed, amazingly, to write our way into a small, rather exclusive creative writing seminar fall semester of &#8216;89 (my first at Brown). This was how I got to know the odd loner junior who lived across the hall from me in my freshman dorm (that would be Todd). As one who became disenchanted rather quickly with all the self-absorbed intellectual and artistic snobbery and bullshit that I encountered at every turn at Brown, I found myself an easy ally in Todd, who shared my bewilderment at the cast of characters and the stories that they produced in that seminar, and I thoroughly enjoyed exchanging impressions with him every week on the latest reading material we had received to critique. Critique! What horror! If you have seen Todd Solondz&#8217;s Storytelling (damn, he already made a film about it!), you will have some idea of what a nightmare and joke a creative writing seminar can be, everyone going around in a circle and giving their invaluable opinion of what someone in the class has created, whether it is warranted or not. Pretty much all the stories we read were crap (and I willlingly include my own here), and all the opinions we heard were crap, but there was one story that stood out, well, two, actually, and if you will humor me and read on, you&#8217;ll see why.</p>
<p>I think we were eighteen, maybe twenty total in the class, and we sat around one large table in a small classroom. But one guy in the class (unlike Todd, I don&#8217;t remember anyone&#8217;s names, which is probably best) sat apart from the rest of us, every class, even if there was room at the table, he sat in a seat against a far wall. He never said a word, never offered an opinion on any of the stories, he hardly looked like he was even listening. This was highly unusual behavior at Brown, particularly in a small upper class seminar. So, when the time finally came to read a story by him, Todd and I were naturally very curious. His story was titled &#8220;The Waistcoat of Skin,&#8221; and it was about a man (or a woman, my memory sucks) who stumbles into some odd shop in some odd town in his travels, and finds some magnetically attractive vest (aka waistcoat&#8230;) hanging there, and, at the ominously eager urging of the shopkeeper, decides to try on the incredibly soft, supple, inviting piece of clothing&#8230; which then proceeds to devour him, merging him into the presumably many many others that have tried on the fatal waistcoat before him. Of course the shopkeeper then hangs the carnivorous waistcoat back up for the next unsuspecting customer to be ensnared by.</p>
<p>This was the most refreshing, delightful, zany, humorous (though I&#8217;m not sure it was meant to be) piece we had read, and, in true form, the author had absolutely nothing to say for himself. Of course no-one else in the class liked it, besides Todd and myself, and if memory serves, I think I avoided sitting across from you Todd so as not to giggle through the entire 2 hours or whatever, though I&#8217;m sure I cracked a few times.</p>
<p>But that guy, whoever he is, wherever he is, was not the true hero of the class. Todd was. When it came time for him to hand in a story towards the end of the semester, we had read a good number already, including a piece written by the grad student teacher of the seminar that was published in the literary journal (the name of which I of course cannot recall&#8230; Todd? Jacob?), which was some indecipherable nonsense in all italics (these are my hands, these are my feet, these are my shoes, these are my socks&#8230; and so on) alternating with some odd conversations in plain text that went nowhere. Confirmed my suspicion that the teacher was no authority on creative writing, at least not the kind that I was interested in. So Todd&#8217;s &#8220;story&#8221; was a mix of highlights of all the semester&#8217;s &#8220;best&#8221; pieces, with obvious references to their style and plot (there was also something about RFK and Marilyn Monroe in there, I think, unless that was in a different story you wrote), and the best was, about the middle of the story, it even broke into italics: these are my hands, these are my feet, this is my shirt, this is my toothbrush (ok, I don&#8217;t remember exactly what he wrote, but you get the idea). I already knew from the Film Bulletin that Todd had iron-clad balls, but this was beyond anything I could have hoped for. As you can probably imagine, the class was not very happy, I don&#8217;t really remember the responses to the piece, I think I was too busy trying to contain my mirth. But I do remember that the teacher was NOT impressed. I was.</p>
<p>I guess this was more than two pennies worth of contribution to your nostalgic look at that year, Todd, but I just couldn&#8217;t resist. I know that sharing that class with you was a highlight for me during that year (hell, during my four years at Brown), and brings a smile to my face to this day.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Batista</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-9407</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-9407</guid>
					<description>No horror at all, actually.  Eighteen years in San Francisco--49 Square Miles Surrounded by Reality!--have caused me to see myself as a conservative and libertarian-friendly, if not card-carrying.  (Just last night I learned that on Feb. 5th my local ballot will include a "Proposition C" which asks "Shall it be City policy that the City should explore and facilitate the acquisition of Alcatraz Island from the United States Government to transform it into a Global Peace Center?"  Sigh.)

Of course, the illusion of my "conservatism" is shattered when I visit the Heartland and talk to actual red-blooded Conservatives, but it's fun to play one at home.

I look forward to reading C4Punks in the not-too-distant future.  (Hey, that domain's available.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No horror at all, actually.  Eighteen years in San Francisco&#8211;49 Square Miles Surrounded by Reality!&#8211;have caused me to see myself as a conservative and libertarian-friendly, if not card-carrying.  (Just last night I learned that on Feb. 5th my local ballot will include a &#8220;Proposition C&#8221; which asks &#8220;Shall it be City policy that the City should explore and facilitate the acquisition of Alcatraz Island from the United States Government to transform it into a Global Peace Center?&#8221;  Sigh.)</p>
<p>Of course, the illusion of my &#8220;conservatism&#8221; is shattered when I visit the Heartland and talk to actual red-blooded Conservatives, but it&#8217;s fun to play one at home.</p>
<p>I look forward to reading C4Punks in the not-too-distant future.  (Hey, that domain&#8217;s available.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-9375</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/11/23/retro-journal-the-palpably-weirder-90s-begin/#comment-9375</guid>
					<description>Thanks so much, Ed.  As you may have noticed from my December blog entries about Jonah Goldberg's book, people still get angry at me sometimes -- but the blogging is made worth it by people like you (and Jenny and Jacob and Mike above, not to mention Jerry Mayer and others on other entries weighing in, sometimes after many years).  My longtime plan, to your initial horror but eventual acceptance, I trust, is to write a book on _Conservatism for Punks_, which will be more bridge than battle, I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much, Ed.  As you may have noticed from my December blog entries about Jonah Goldberg&#8217;s book, people still get angry at me sometimes &#8212; but the blogging is made worth it by people like you (and Jenny and Jacob and Mike above, not to mention Jerry Mayer and others on other entries weighing in, sometimes after many years).  My longtime plan, to your initial horror but eventual acceptance, I trust, is to write a book on _Conservatism for Punks_, which will be more bridge than battle, I hope.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
