<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Zero-Child Policy</title>
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-1486</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-1486</guid>
					<description>I would like to say that I think it's great someone doesn't want to have kids. It seems like everyone you meet (and more so with every birthday you have) people want to know when you will have kids and how many will you have and how your life would be even better with them. Like it's any of their business to begin with. Are they morally or financially going to support this family they want you to have? 
I agree- if you want them, have them and if not- that's great too. So many people don't truly appreciate the kids they have, yet I've noticed an over reproduction. I can definately see Todd's point about the nagging and drooling and being responsible for at least the next 18 years for another human, when most cannot even take care of themselves. I have one child, and you know what, for me that is perfect. I am glad I had her and its worked out for the best for me and my family. But no I am not having another one. I don't want another one. I did it once and it was the most challenging and rewarding thing I have done yet. (For now I would like to say I think I am doing a good job. I am proud of how she is turning out.) I do not have any desire for another child. Not even a little. Many people have to vocalize their dislike for the fact I have "only" one child. Isn't She lonely? they say. Well my Mother decided to ask her view on that. And you know what her answer was? "No, I already have friends." For some reason people have this misnomer that ONLY is bad. It's not. I like when people can respect each others choices. The child rearing or choice not to gets to be such a touchy subject -at least for me. Fuck off and mind your own business... Oh wait one last thing! I even went to the gyn and she was very against my decision for a tubal ligation. "What if something happens to your husband and you want another one?" She said to me. Well is that any way to live a life... what if? "When you take someones choice away, it suddenly makes a big impact. You may regret your decision." At least that statement made a little more sense! OK but as stated above, I would much rather wake up one day and say, "Too bad I didn't have another child." Then wake up and resent an innocent child I never wanted. In the end if I changed my mind then I'll adopt. If I want a child so badly it shouldn't matter how it came into my family. I won't even get a puppy because it requires even half the amount of effort I've put into rearing a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to say that I think it&#8217;s great someone doesn&#8217;t want to have kids. It seems like everyone you meet (and more so with every birthday you have) people want to know when you will have kids and how many will you have and how your life would be even better with them. Like it&#8217;s any of their business to begin with. Are they morally or financially going to support this family they want you to have?<br />
I agree- if you want them, have them and if not- that&#8217;s great too. So many people don&#8217;t truly appreciate the kids they have, yet I&#8217;ve noticed an over reproduction. I can definately see Todd&#8217;s point about the nagging and drooling and being responsible for at least the next 18 years for another human, when most cannot even take care of themselves. I have one child, and you know what, for me that is perfect. I am glad I had her and its worked out for the best for me and my family. But no I am not having another one. I don&#8217;t want another one. I did it once and it was the most challenging and rewarding thing I have done yet. (For now I would like to say I think I am doing a good job. I am proud of how she is turning out.) I do not have any desire for another child. Not even a little. Many people have to vocalize their dislike for the fact I have &#8220;only&#8221; one child. Isn&#8217;t She lonely? they say. Well my Mother decided to ask her view on that. And you know what her answer was? &#8220;No, I already have friends.&#8221; For some reason people have this misnomer that ONLY is bad. It&#8217;s not. I like when people can respect each others choices. The child rearing or choice not to gets to be such a touchy subject -at least for me. Fuck off and mind your own business&#8230; Oh wait one last thing! I even went to the gyn and she was very against my decision for a tubal ligation. &#8220;What if something happens to your husband and you want another one?&#8221; She said to me. Well is that any way to live a life&#8230; what if? &#8220;When you take someones choice away, it suddenly makes a big impact. You may regret your decision.&#8221; At least that statement made a little more sense! OK but as stated above, I would much rather wake up one day and say, &#8220;Too bad I didn&#8217;t have another child.&#8221; Then wake up and resent an innocent child I never wanted. In the end if I changed my mind then I&#8217;ll adopt. If I want a child so badly it shouldn&#8217;t matter how it came into my family. I won&#8217;t even get a puppy because it requires even half the amount of effort I&#8217;ve put into rearing a child.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Funny</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-1072</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-1072</guid>
					<description>Brain - no, parents don't have an absolute right to pressure their kids to have children.  Who gives a crap that it's tradition?  So are lots of nonsensical things.  I want children because I think I have a lot of love to give, and I want to be loved by them, too.  Both pretty selfish reasons.  I admit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brain - no, parents don&#8217;t have an absolute right to pressure their kids to have children.  Who gives a crap that it&#8217;s tradition?  So are lots of nonsensical things.  I want children because I think I have a lot of love to give, and I want to be loved by them, too.  Both pretty selfish reasons.  I admit it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Funny</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-1071</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-1071</guid>
					<description>I think it is pretty obviously selfish to HAVE kids.  I'm not saying it's the most selfish thing in the world, but the main reasons people have kids are to satisfy and amuse themselves and perpetuate their genes.  I don't think those are horrible reasons, and I would like to have kids myself.  I also (unselishly) believe that if I raise them right, they will add some good to the world.  But to call Todd selfish because he DOESN'T want kids?  Preposterous.  The world, and our country especially, is not lacking in kids.  There is no baby drought.  There are, of course, kids who need good homes.

If Todd isn't into kids, he shouldn't have them.  If I were dating him, that would make me sad, not just because he doesn't want them, but because he doesn't have that warm need to hug kiddies when he sees them.  Still, it's his choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is pretty obviously selfish to HAVE kids.  I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s the most selfish thing in the world, but the main reasons people have kids are to satisfy and amuse themselves and perpetuate their genes.  I don&#8217;t think those are horrible reasons, and I would like to have kids myself.  I also (unselishly) believe that if I raise them right, they will add some good to the world.  But to call Todd selfish because he DOESN&#8217;T want kids?  Preposterous.  The world, and our country especially, is not lacking in kids.  There is no baby drought.  There are, of course, kids who need good homes.</p>
<p>If Todd isn&#8217;t into kids, he shouldn&#8217;t have them.  If I were dating him, that would make me sad, not just because he doesn&#8217;t want them, but because he doesn&#8217;t have that warm need to hug kiddies when he sees them.  Still, it&#8217;s his choice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brain</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-988</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 04:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-988</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Daddy?&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Yes, Son?&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;What does regret mean&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Well, son, a funny thing about regret is, that it's better to regret something you have done, than something you haven't done.  And  by the way, if you see your Mom this weekend, will you be sure to tell her...
SATAN SATAN SATAN!&lt;/em&gt;

-Sweat Loaf, Butthole Surfers

It seems somehow appropriate.  I can't wait until my 3 1/2 year old is old enough to appreciate that song. He already takes well to moshing.  The 1 year old is willing but not yet able.

Parents do have an absolute right to pressure their kids for grandchildren.  In fact, providing grandchildren is just about the most elemental obligation a child owes his or her parents.  The problem arises in the permissive parenting of the last 50 years, where traditional mores and expectations were not passed down in a despondent fit of self-loathing over two generations.

The ambivalence towards bearing and raising children by so many of my peers, shared by myself up until a few years ago, is indicative of the unhappily self-indulgent and immature world-view we suffer from.  What is salient about this in reference to our host, Mr. Seavey, is that he is ostensibly a great defender of tradition.  I think that we realize, in actually, that this robot-loving libertarian is just a traditionalist &lt;em&gt;poseur&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;em&gt;J'accuse!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><cite>Daddy?</cite></em></p>
<p><em>Yes, Son?</em></p>
<p><em>What does regret mean</em></p>
<p><em>Well, son, a funny thing about regret is, that it&#8217;s better to regret something you have done, than something you haven&#8217;t done.  And  by the way, if you see your Mom this weekend, will you be sure to tell her&#8230;<br />
SATAN SATAN SATAN!</em></p>
<p>-Sweat Loaf, Butthole Surfers</p>
<p>It seems somehow appropriate.  I can&#8217;t wait until my 3 1/2 year old is old enough to appreciate that song. He already takes well to moshing.  The 1 year old is willing but not yet able.</p>
<p>Parents do have an absolute right to pressure their kids for grandchildren.  In fact, providing grandchildren is just about the most elemental obligation a child owes his or her parents.  The problem arises in the permissive parenting of the last 50 years, where traditional mores and expectations were not passed down in a despondent fit of self-loathing over two generations.</p>
<p>The ambivalence towards bearing and raising children by so many of my peers, shared by myself up until a few years ago, is indicative of the unhappily self-indulgent and immature world-view we suffer from.  What is salient about this in reference to our host, Mr. Seavey, is that he is ostensibly a great defender of tradition.  I think that we realize, in actually, that this robot-loving libertarian is just a traditionalist <em>poseur</em>.</p>
<p><em>J&#8217;accuse!</em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: missb</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-986</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-986</guid>
					<description>There's a whole lot going on here, but I'll throw in my two cents, too. There are snippets of truths all over the place; in Todd's post and in several of the comments (although seemingly none in Nicole's). Wherever shall I start?

First off, I'm 90% certain I don't want kids. I'm 50% certain that the 10% of me that is unsure is due to the fact that I turn 38 this year. I think kids are nifty -- babies escpecially, believe it or not -- but the overwhelming responsibility (and the lack of sleep and the time-suck and the utter about-face of the focus of my life) gives me hives. Now that my window of opportunity is sliding shut, I find I'm thinking about kids with alarming frequency. Three years ago I could not have cared less. I was single and loving it and was totally ambivalent about having kids of my own. 

Todd is not alone in being totally put off my kids for the reasons he's cited here. I have several friends who feel EXACTLY the same way (and three of them are women) so I'm surprised that people are surprised by it. Maybe I just hang out with a weird crowd. I know men and women who react with actual disgust when people shove babies in their faces for their cheeks to get pinched. They make that "I just ate a lemon" face. Kids are baffling to them. They think they are simply "yucky". But none think that they are too unintelligent to deal with.

Todd, you can't seriously claim to dislike kids because they are unintelligent. They're wildly intelligent (well, many are, anyway) and learn things at a rate that puts most adults to shame! Ever see a two month old discover his/her tongue? Feet? It's amazing and totally hilarious. I digress. Developmental stages are just that: stages. 

You know what flips my wig? What really makes me crazed? When people (usually pregnant friends, new parents or My Own Mother) tell me "but you'd be soooo good at it! All those smarts! All that patience of yours! So caring!". This is uncool. The fact that other people lament that the world will somehow lose out if I don't attempt to create a teeny-me to carry on my -- my what? My good nature? As if that was somehow guaranteed in my offspring-- makes me bananas. The world will trudge on, I'm sure. Todd is a singular character: interesting as all hell and smart enough to know how smart he is, and guess what? One Todd is fine. 

I've been told I was selfish for not having kids! Selfish! I posit that perhaps THE most selfish thing a human can do on this planet is breed. I really enjoy kids, and I don't hold it against people if they want to have them (unless they have more than two and don't live on a working farm, and unless insurance is paying for infertility treatments). What I DO resent is that I am constantly being treated like a second class citizen because I am childless. I fall out of the cultural norm and am thereby "weird", and it's totally okay if my co-workers are late because they were at little Betsey's dance recital, but I get in trouble if I miss the train. I could go on. I won't.

I happen to have met and fallen in love with a man who insists he doesn't want children...unless there are children around. Then he lights up like a Christmas Tree. The man is The Baby Whisperer. It's a little frustrating. Watching him is what nags at my 10%. 

Todd doesn't feel The Urge. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that I don't feel The Urge either, but as a woman I'm under far more cultural pressure to reproduce. It's screwed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a whole lot going on here, but I&#8217;ll throw in my two cents, too. There are snippets of truths all over the place; in Todd&#8217;s post and in several of the comments (although seemingly none in Nicole&#8217;s). Wherever shall I start?</p>
<p>First off, I&#8217;m 90% certain I don&#8217;t want kids. I&#8217;m 50% certain that the 10% of me that is unsure is due to the fact that I turn 38 this year. I think kids are nifty &#8212; babies escpecially, believe it or not &#8212; but the overwhelming responsibility (and the lack of sleep and the time-suck and the utter about-face of the focus of my life) gives me hives. Now that my window of opportunity is sliding shut, I find I&#8217;m thinking about kids with alarming frequency. Three years ago I could not have cared less. I was single and loving it and was totally ambivalent about having kids of my own. </p>
<p>Todd is not alone in being totally put off my kids for the reasons he&#8217;s cited here. I have several friends who feel EXACTLY the same way (and three of them are women) so I&#8217;m surprised that people are surprised by it. Maybe I just hang out with a weird crowd. I know men and women who react with actual disgust when people shove babies in their faces for their cheeks to get pinched. They make that &#8220;I just ate a lemon&#8221; face. Kids are baffling to them. They think they are simply &#8220;yucky&#8221;. But none think that they are too unintelligent to deal with.</p>
<p>Todd, you can&#8217;t seriously claim to dislike kids because they are unintelligent. They&#8217;re wildly intelligent (well, many are, anyway) and learn things at a rate that puts most adults to shame! Ever see a two month old discover his/her tongue? Feet? It&#8217;s amazing and totally hilarious. I digress. Developmental stages are just that: stages. </p>
<p>You know what flips my wig? What really makes me crazed? When people (usually pregnant friends, new parents or My Own Mother) tell me &#8220;but you&#8217;d be soooo good at it! All those smarts! All that patience of yours! So caring!&#8221;. This is uncool. The fact that other people lament that the world will somehow lose out if I don&#8217;t attempt to create a teeny-me to carry on my &#8212; my what? My good nature? As if that was somehow guaranteed in my offspring&#8211; makes me bananas. The world will trudge on, I&#8217;m sure. Todd is a singular character: interesting as all hell and smart enough to know how smart he is, and guess what? One Todd is fine. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been told I was selfish for not having kids! Selfish! I posit that perhaps THE most selfish thing a human can do on this planet is breed. I really enjoy kids, and I don&#8217;t hold it against people if they want to have them (unless they have more than two and don&#8217;t live on a working farm, and unless insurance is paying for infertility treatments). What I DO resent is that I am constantly being treated like a second class citizen because I am childless. I fall out of the cultural norm and am thereby &#8220;weird&#8221;, and it&#8217;s totally okay if my co-workers are late because they were at little Betsey&#8217;s dance recital, but I get in trouble if I miss the train. I could go on. I won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I happen to have met and fallen in love with a man who insists he doesn&#8217;t want children&#8230;unless there are children around. Then he lights up like a Christmas Tree. The man is The Baby Whisperer. It&#8217;s a little frustrating. Watching him is what nags at my 10%. </p>
<p>Todd doesn&#8217;t feel The Urge. There&#8217;s absolutely nothing wrong with that I don&#8217;t feel The Urge either, but as a woman I&#8217;m under far more cultural pressure to reproduce. It&#8217;s screwed up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gina Duclayan</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-949</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-949</guid>
					<description>I've discussed this with Todd before, so it's not like this post is going to change his mind...but here goes. In his post, Todd states, "Some people look at kids...and feel a deep, visceral need to go grab them, marvel at their cuteness, squeeze their cheeks, ask how old they are, and dream up ways to get one just like that inside their wombs as quickly as possible." Though I admit there are people like this, I was never one of them. In fact, babysitting as a way of earning money as a teenager was always repellent to me. As someone else said here, other people's children are just not my thing (for the most part). One's own children are a completely different story. It's odd to me that Todd can't seem to get his brain around that concept.

There is no way that I would say that parenting is completely fun, or in any way easy. However, it is such a rich and amazing experience. Something I am so glad that I did not miss out on.

The thing that makes Todd's attitude on this score so frustrating is that Todd has so many characteristics that I think would make him a great parent. He's intellectually curious, caring, mature, sane, and funny, just for starters. Just on intellectual curiosity alone, I think if he tried it, he'd really like it. But add in compassion, maturity, sanity, and humor, and, well, he seems a natural. 

I have many friends who do not want kids, and it doesn't trouble me at all. With Todd it does trouble me a bit because I think he'd be good at it; I think he'd have great kids; and, most importantly, I think he'd really enjoy it. With most of my other friends who don't want kids, it makes sense to me. With Todd, it doesn't make sense to me. But, whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve discussed this with Todd before, so it&#8217;s not like this post is going to change his mind&#8230;but here goes. In his post, Todd states, &#8220;Some people look at kids&#8230;and feel a deep, visceral need to go grab them, marvel at their cuteness, squeeze their cheeks, ask how old they are, and dream up ways to get one just like that inside their wombs as quickly as possible.&#8221; Though I admit there are people like this, I was never one of them. In fact, babysitting as a way of earning money as a teenager was always repellent to me. As someone else said here, other people&#8217;s children are just not my thing (for the most part). One&#8217;s own children are a completely different story. It&#8217;s odd to me that Todd can&#8217;t seem to get his brain around that concept.</p>
<p>There is no way that I would say that parenting is completely fun, or in any way easy. However, it is such a rich and amazing experience. Something I am so glad that I did not miss out on.</p>
<p>The thing that makes Todd&#8217;s attitude on this score so frustrating is that Todd has so many characteristics that I think would make him a great parent. He&#8217;s intellectually curious, caring, mature, sane, and funny, just for starters. Just on intellectual curiosity alone, I think if he tried it, he&#8217;d really like it. But add in compassion, maturity, sanity, and humor, and, well, he seems a natural. </p>
<p>I have many friends who do not want kids, and it doesn&#8217;t trouble me at all. With Todd it does trouble me a bit because I think he&#8217;d be good at it; I think he&#8217;d have great kids; and, most importantly, I think he&#8217;d really enjoy it. With most of my other friends who don&#8217;t want kids, it makes sense to me. With Todd, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. But, whatever.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Koli</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-931</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-931</guid>
					<description>Judging from some of the pro-child posts here, "warmth and compassion" don't necessarily accompany the desire for children.  

I adore children. But I find it disturbing that a desire for them should be assigned --in an offhand way-- some definitive importance in whether one has any number of other qualities.  

Todd is in no way lacking in protective instincts, generosity, tenderness or the ability to enjoy "unpredictability in [his] companions." Likewise, my sisters, who are both straight and married and who have chosen not to become mothers, have plenty of warmth, compassion, kindness and affection --including affection for other people's children. Osama Bin Laden, on the other hand, has chosen to reproduce. 

Parenthood is a wonderful ambition, one that I can't wait to fulfill, but there is absolutely no basis for requiring it as a measure of humanity. 

On a side note: Ersza is correct in that Todd's description of children seems to "confuse developmental stages with 'intelligence'.” I was just telling him that the other day. Rejecting children because they are cognitively unskilled is a little like rejecting the early chapters of books because the ideas introduced in them aren't yet fully developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging from some of the pro-child posts here, &#8220;warmth and compassion&#8221; don&#8217;t necessarily accompany the desire for children.  </p>
<p>I adore children. But I find it disturbing that a desire for them should be assigned &#8211;in an offhand way&#8211; some definitive importance in whether one has any number of other qualities.  </p>
<p>Todd is in no way lacking in protective instincts, generosity, tenderness or the ability to enjoy &#8220;unpredictability in [his] companions.&#8221; Likewise, my sisters, who are both straight and married and who have chosen not to become mothers, have plenty of warmth, compassion, kindness and affection &#8211;including affection for other people&#8217;s children. Osama Bin Laden, on the other hand, has chosen to reproduce. </p>
<p>Parenthood is a wonderful ambition, one that I can&#8217;t wait to fulfill, but there is absolutely no basis for requiring it as a measure of humanity. </p>
<p>On a side note: Ersza is correct in that Todd&#8217;s description of children seems to &#8220;confuse developmental stages with &#8216;intelligence&#8217;.” I was just telling him that the other day. Rejecting children because they are cognitively unskilled is a little like rejecting the early chapters of books because the ideas introduced in them aren&#8217;t yet fully developed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Laura</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-925</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-925</guid>
					<description>Well, not to get into the whole "I'm posting something on the internet and therefore I must prove my point with circumstantial evidence that I think is better than your circumstantial evidence that was supposed to prove something on the internet" thing, but some of my best friends, who happen to be rather feminine lesbians, also happen to be mothers.  I'm a mother (but not a lesbian) and I often don't feel particularly feminine, nurturing, warm, or compassionate.  Perhaps that's because I'm the mother of a toddler, and most days I hardly know my own name.  

Many of Todd's most persistent defenders so far have been those of us who understand the difficulty and challenges of parenthood from experience, and still have the energy to accept and tolerate that other people might not feel the same way about children that we do.  My earlier comment was intended as evidence that Todd has a great amount of warmth and compassion.  I still can't understand why not wanting or liking children, and publicly describing these feelings with wit and eloquence, should make someone a terrible, heartless, intolerant person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not to get into the whole &#8220;I&#8217;m posting something on the internet and therefore I must prove my point with circumstantial evidence that I think is better than your circumstantial evidence that was supposed to prove something on the internet&#8221; thing, but some of my best friends, who happen to be rather feminine lesbians, also happen to be mothers.  I&#8217;m a mother (but not a lesbian) and I often don&#8217;t feel particularly feminine, nurturing, warm, or compassionate.  Perhaps that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m the mother of a toddler, and most days I hardly know my own name.  </p>
<p>Many of Todd&#8217;s most persistent defenders so far have been those of us who understand the difficulty and challenges of parenthood from experience, and still have the energy to accept and tolerate that other people might not feel the same way about children that we do.  My earlier comment was intended as evidence that Todd has a great amount of warmth and compassion.  I still can&#8217;t understand why not wanting or liking children, and publicly describing these feelings with wit and eloquence, should make someone a terrible, heartless, intolerant person.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ersza</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-924</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-924</guid>
					<description>This is a driveby, and for that I apologize. What strikes me about this post is that what I am reading is "I am too intelligent to spend my time with people who are beneath my intellectual level."

I have no argument with anyone's desire not to have children. In fact, I think it's a choice more people should make. It's obvious that our species produces some good "breeders" and also some good "workers." However, Todd, I wish you would reconsider your views about the children themselves. I can tell you have not been around children much at all in your life. You confuse developmental stages with "intelligence." A person can be three years old, and not know how to use the bathroom, but still be an intelligent, insightful, fascinating little person. In fact, one of the great things about children is in talking to them and hearing what they think about life. They can give you a very different perspective on things. 

Anyway, I want to support your decision not to have children, but also to call you out for what seems like a basic lack of respect for a whole category of human beings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a driveby, and for that I apologize. What strikes me about this post is that what I am reading is &#8220;I am too intelligent to spend my time with people who are beneath my intellectual level.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have no argument with anyone&#8217;s desire not to have children. In fact, I think it&#8217;s a choice more people should make. It&#8217;s obvious that our species produces some good &#8220;breeders&#8221; and also some good &#8220;workers.&#8221; However, Todd, I wish you would reconsider your views about the children themselves. I can tell you have not been around children much at all in your life. You confuse developmental stages with &#8220;intelligence.&#8221; A person can be three years old, and not know how to use the bathroom, but still be an intelligent, insightful, fascinating little person. In fact, one of the great things about children is in talking to them and hearing what they think about life. They can give you a very different perspective on things. </p>
<p>Anyway, I want to support your decision not to have children, but also to call you out for what seems like a basic lack of respect for a whole category of human beings.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Clara</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-922</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/06/18/the-zero-child-policy/#comment-922</guid>
					<description>Dinka has a point.  I think the postmaster's insistence on near-perfection in a significant other is somehow related to an intolerance of children, who are born weak, ignorant and literally "immature."  

But the lovability of dependent children who grow into self-reliance and the enjoyment of slight unpredictability in one's companions -- there are instincts that one either senses or can never be taught.  Todd cant be faulted for something he does not feel.

I do wonder about a fatherhood-averse man finding a straight woman who shares his disdain for children.  (Growing up, I had two female friends who were adamantly against motherhood.  Both now are lesbians.)  Motherhood and femininity seem, to me, bound inextricably.  What sort of woman lacks the nurturing instinct for motherhood, yet embodies the warmth and compassion of a girlfriend?  Similarly, if a man has no interest in defending the weak, mentoring others and providing for dependent relatives--what sort of man is he?

Leo Tolstoy (_War and Peace_) said it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dinka has a point.  I think the postmaster&#8217;s insistence on near-perfection in a significant other is somehow related to an intolerance of children, who are born weak, ignorant and literally &#8220;immature.&#8221;  </p>
<p>But the lovability of dependent children who grow into self-reliance and the enjoyment of slight unpredictability in one&#8217;s companions &#8212; there are instincts that one either senses or can never be taught.  Todd cant be faulted for something he does not feel.</p>
<p>I do wonder about a fatherhood-averse man finding a straight woman who shares his disdain for children.  (Growing up, I had two female friends who were adamantly against motherhood.  Both now are lesbians.)  Motherhood and femininity seem, to me, bound inextricably.  What sort of woman lacks the nurturing instinct for motherhood, yet embodies the warmth and compassion of a girlfriend?  Similarly, if a man has no interest in defending the weak, mentoring others and providing for dependent relatives&#8211;what sort of man is he?</p>
<p>Leo Tolstoy (_War and Peace_) said it better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
