<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aborting Feminism, Adding Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:31:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brutal Libertarian Attack Against Feminism - antimisandry.com</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-45545</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutal Libertarian Attack Against Feminism - antimisandry.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-45545</guid>
		<description>[...] permalink                ToddSeavey.com Blog Archive Aborting Feminism, Adding Links  This is the best article I have ever read against Feminism. Not only does it batter Feminism mercilessly, it conclusively proves that Feminist thought is entirely contrary to Libertarianism.  Many women and manginas are trying to say that not only can Feminism be mixed with Libertarianism, but Feminism is actually essential to Libertarianism.   I also believe this shows that there is no place for women in Libertarianism (except for Ayn Rand, who is dead). Women will try to Feminize any movement they become a part of.    Real men hate women [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] permalink                ToddSeavey.com Blog Archive Aborting Feminism, Adding Links  This is the best article I have ever read against Feminism. Not only does it batter Feminism mercilessly, it conclusively proves that Feminist thought is entirely contrary to Libertarianism.  Many women and manginas are trying to say that not only can Feminism be mixed with Libertarianism, but Feminism is actually essential to Libertarianism.   I also believe this shows that there is no place for women in Libertarianism (except for Ayn Rand, who is dead). Women will try to Feminize any movement they become a part of.    Real men hate women [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduard Blutig</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-28984</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduard Blutig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-28984</guid>
		<description>Well, I could spend all day writing responses to each and every point above, but that would probably be really exhausting a really, really long. So there&#039;s just one issue I want to commit myself to for now.

It&#039;s that even if men and women are fundamentally, innately different, they&#039;re also really, really similar. Even in testing that found sex differences in general intelligence, men and women overlap A LOT on a bellcurve (there&#039;s a research article by Jackson and Rushton (I forget the year it was written) that takes the position that women have less intellectual potential than men, but even their graphs and numbers betray a large overlap). What this means is that sex differences in intelligence are actually really worthless to understanding how to better educate either sex. The fact that the discrepancies, like men who are good at writing and women who are good at math, make research on differences useless and even detrimental. If you assume a student is going to be in one category when they are, in fact, predisposed to another, then you&#039;ve just basically looked at someone&#039;s chromosomes or genitalia and doomed them to a life of studying in a way that does not suit or benefit them at all (like forcing lefties to write right-handed, for a loose sort of example). I see less of a threat to social/political policy when examining specific cognitive abilities in men and women. But general intelligence research is both flawed and possesses a lot of potential to do great harm to either or both sexes (particularly women, as this research happens to be conducted predominantly by those with an investment in maleness).

Other than that, I feel like a lot of the statements above fundamentally misunderstand the role feminism plays in my life, though I can&#039;t speak for others. Clearly women are treated as less-than-equal in the public sphere of life, but it&#039;s interesting to observe that men faces similar, complementary challenges in the private realm. Not to mention those who do not fall into either category, male or female.

But perhaps that&#039;s neither here nor there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I could spend all day writing responses to each and every point above, but that would probably be really exhausting a really, really long. So there&#8217;s just one issue I want to commit myself to for now.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that even if men and women are fundamentally, innately different, they&#8217;re also really, really similar. Even in testing that found sex differences in general intelligence, men and women overlap A LOT on a bellcurve (there&#8217;s a research article by Jackson and Rushton (I forget the year it was written) that takes the position that women have less intellectual potential than men, but even their graphs and numbers betray a large overlap). What this means is that sex differences in intelligence are actually really worthless to understanding how to better educate either sex. The fact that the discrepancies, like men who are good at writing and women who are good at math, make research on differences useless and even detrimental. If you assume a student is going to be in one category when they are, in fact, predisposed to another, then you&#8217;ve just basically looked at someone&#8217;s chromosomes or genitalia and doomed them to a life of studying in a way that does not suit or benefit them at all (like forcing lefties to write right-handed, for a loose sort of example). I see less of a threat to social/political policy when examining specific cognitive abilities in men and women. But general intelligence research is both flawed and possesses a lot of potential to do great harm to either or both sexes (particularly women, as this research happens to be conducted predominantly by those with an investment in maleness).</p>
<p>Other than that, I feel like a lot of the statements above fundamentally misunderstand the role feminism plays in my life, though I can&#8217;t speak for others. Clearly women are treated as less-than-equal in the public sphere of life, but it&#8217;s interesting to observe that men faces similar, complementary challenges in the private realm. Not to mention those who do not fall into either category, male or female.</p>
<p>But perhaps that&#8217;s neither here nor there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Terminator, Buffy, and the Elektra Complex</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-19487</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Terminator, Buffy, and the Elektra Complex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-19487</guid>
		<description>[...] That teen-girl-butt-kicker archetype in turn echoes his character Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and she&#8217;s as good as any starting point for talking about tensions within &#8220;third wave&#8221; feminism (for many people, this entry just got a lot less fun fast). Long philosophical story short: feminism is an amorphous thing that may have some good points (despite my ten-point critique of it in a prior entry that generated so many negative comments), but I&#8217;m not sure that pretending that girls can routinely beat up boys is its strongest suit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That teen-girl-butt-kicker archetype in turn echoes his character Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and she&#8217;s as good as any starting point for talking about tensions within &#8220;third wave&#8221; feminism (for many people, this entry just got a lot less fun fast). Long philosophical story short: feminism is an amorphous thing that may have some good points (despite my ten-point critique of it in a prior entry that generated so many negative comments), but I&#8217;m not sure that pretending that girls can routinely beat up boys is its strongest suit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koli</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Koli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>For any who may be interested, check out the recent comment to Todd&#039;s Statement of Principles, where a reader called E6 weighs in with a definition of feminism.  

http://toddseavey.com/brief-statement-of-principles/#comment-1295</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any who may be interested, check out the recent comment to Todd&#8217;s Statement of Principles, where a reader called E6 weighs in with a definition of feminism.  </p>
<p><a href="http://toddseavey.com/brief-statement-of-principles/#comment-1295" rel="nofollow">http://toddseavey.com/brief-statement-of-principles/#comment-1295</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bessman</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bessman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-910</guid>
		<description>Be sure to watch me argue with myself profusely in &lt;a href=&quot;http://toddseavey.com/2007/05/25/men-women-again/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this follow on post.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be sure to watch me argue with myself profusely in <a href="http://toddseavey.com/2007/05/25/men-women-again/#comments" rel="nofollow">this follow on post.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel.Evanchik.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Political Correctness</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel.Evanchik.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Political Correctness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet we are all, if we are not psychopaths, aware that some words might offend others.  Even if no offense is intended, we generally try to avoid giving this offense.  Airing our views publicly, in a protected forum, often makes us insensitive to the hurt feelings our speech may produce. My friend Todd Seavey has spoken on the subjects of feminism, child-raising, and dating provocatively online in a manner I would be shocked to see him speak in person-to-person. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yet we are all, if we are not psychopaths, aware that some words might offend others.  Even if no offense is intended, we generally try to avoid giving this offense.  Airing our views publicly, in a protected forum, often makes us insensitive to the hurt feelings our speech may produce. My friend Todd Seavey has spoken on the subjects of feminism, child-raising, and dating provocatively online in a manner I would be shocked to see him speak in person-to-person. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Personal Ad and the 6/20 Break-Ups Debate</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Personal Ad and the 6/20 Break-Ups Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-793</guid>
		<description>[...] He was even more urgent in requesting that I not read his antifeminist post until I got to know him a little better. This gave me pause. The discovery that he actually has an &#8220;antifeminist post&#8221; made me think twice about agreeing to get to know him at all. But he seemed to be a good guy and a thoughtful guy, so I said to myself: what the hell? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He was even more urgent in requesting that I not read his antifeminist post until I got to know him a little better. This gave me pause. The discovery that he actually has an &#8220;antifeminist post&#8221; made me think twice about agreeing to get to know him at all. But he seemed to be a good guy and a thoughtful guy, so I said to myself: what the hell? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Seavey</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Seavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 02:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>And for a reply to Peter Bessman and the seduction community, you might want to check out my aforementioned girlfriend&#039;s post at ToddSeavey.com&#039;s 5/25/2007 entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for a reply to Peter Bessman and the seduction community, you might want to check out my aforementioned girlfriend&#8217;s post at ToddSeavey.com&#8217;s 5/25/2007 entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Men, Women, Again</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Men, Women, Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 02:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>[...] A very special guest-blogger (with whom I&#8217;ll be at Niagara Falls over the weekend, so debate politely in our absence) weighs in on the comments of Peter the &#8220;seduction community&#8221; member who commented so intriguingly in the long thread resulting from my earlier post on feminism (I should say that while I stand by pretty much everything I said in that entry, I acknowledge that this is a vast terrain of never-ending debate, and I emphasized the select areas I felt were being overlooked, often annoyingly so &#8212; but, hey, my account of things is arguably far more nuanced than, say, MenAreBetterThanWomen.com): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A very special guest-blogger (with whom I&#8217;ll be at Niagara Falls over the weekend, so debate politely in our absence) weighs in on the comments of Peter the &#8220;seduction community&#8221; member who commented so intriguingly in the long thread resulting from my earlier post on feminism (I should say that while I stand by pretty much everything I said in that entry, I acknowledge that this is a vast terrain of never-ending debate, and I emphasized the select areas I felt were being overlooked, often annoyingly so &#8212; but, hey, my account of things is arguably far more nuanced than, say, MenAreBetterThanWomen.com): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GenderWar Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/comment-page-3/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>GenderWar Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 17:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddseavey.com/2007/04/21/aborting-feminism-adding-links/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I have created a pro-men website and was wondering if you would consider listing it as an external link on your site. I will be happy to add a reciprocal link back to your site in return. Thankyou for your consideration.

www.genderwar.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I have created a pro-men website and was wondering if you would consider listing it as an external link on your site. I will be happy to add a reciprocal link back to your site in return. Thankyou for your consideration.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.genderwar.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.genderwar.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
