<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.9" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After Virtue, After Virginia</title>
	<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/01/10/after-virtue-after-virginia/</link>
	<description>Conservatism for punks.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.9</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Selection of the Month: &#8220;After Virtue&#8221; by Alasdair MacIntyre</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/01/10/after-virtue-after-virginia/#comment-49</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/01/10/after-virtue-after-virginia/#comment-49</guid>
					<description>[...] There&#8217;s something Mobius-strip-like about his syncretism, leading via a given philosophy to its apparent opposite and back again without being fickle about it. It reminds me that one of the things I want to try very hard to do on this blog is avoid simply pitting my single philosophy against all the enemy philosophies (I think that&#8217;s been done to death) and instead try to set a positive (and hopefully somewhat surprising) example of drawing on any and all philosophical and political influences that offer insight, without pausing to advertise the fact that I&#8217;m crossing a quasi-tribal boundary. G.K. Chesterton, for example, had some very valuable insights even though there is no God, so why not use them? (Indeed, one of our debaters at Lolita Bar this month is a big Chesterton fan, something we can agree on despite my atheism and her gung-ho Catholicism &#8212; and speaking of our debate on sexual mores at Lolita, I notice that MacIntyre has been married three times, though this isn&#8217;t necessarily at odds with his Greco-Roman conception of the virtues.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There&#8217;s something Mobius-strip-like about his syncretism, leading via a given philosophy to its apparent opposite and back again without being fickle about it. It reminds me that one of the things I want to try very hard to do on this blog is avoid simply pitting my single philosophy against all the enemy philosophies (I think that&#8217;s been done to death) and instead try to set a positive (and hopefully somewhat surprising) example of drawing on any and all philosophical and political influences that offer insight, without pausing to advertise the fact that I&#8217;m crossing a quasi-tribal boundary. G.K. Chesterton, for example, had some very valuable insights even though there is no God, so why not use them? (Indeed, one of our debaters at Lolita Bar this month is a big Chesterton fan, something we can agree on despite my atheism and her gung-ho Catholicism &#8212; and speaking of our debate on sexual mores at Lolita, I notice that MacIntyre has been married three times, though this isn&#8217;t necessarily at odds with his Greco-Roman conception of the virtues.) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ToddSeavey.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Selection of the Month: &#8220;Thrill of the Chaste&#8221; by Dawn Eden/&#8221;A Christmas Caroline&#8221; by Kyle Smith</title>
		<link>http://toddseavey.com/2007/01/10/after-virtue-after-virginia/#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://toddseavey.com/2007/01/10/after-virtue-after-virginia/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>[...] Science- and econ-loving guy that I am, I wouldn&#8217;t normally plug a book (aimed at Christian women) about how to avoid premarital sex while navigating the modern dating scene, but it just so happens an ex-girlfriend of mine wrote this and devoted a section to her failed attempt to sustain a relationship with an atheist boyfriend she calls &#8220;Tom&#8221; but who is actually called &#8220;Todd Seavey&#8221; (and indeed, I suggested that she use my real name so that I can get proper credit for my work, but at least some of you now know the truth, or at least that paltry portion of it given to the mind of mortal man to know, etc., etc.).  [UPDATE: Dawn was one of our January debaters at Lolita Bar, up against former Salon.com sex columnist and author of I Love You, Let&#8217;s Meet, Virginia Vitzthum.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Science- and econ-loving guy that I am, I wouldn&#8217;t normally plug a book (aimed at Christian women) about how to avoid premarital sex while navigating the modern dating scene, but it just so happens an ex-girlfriend of mine wrote this and devoted a section to her failed attempt to sustain a relationship with an atheist boyfriend she calls &#8220;Tom&#8221; but who is actually called &#8220;Todd Seavey&#8221; (and indeed, I suggested that she use my real name so that I can get proper credit for my work, but at least some of you now know the truth, or at least that paltry portion of it given to the mind of mortal man to know, etc., etc.).  [UPDATE: Dawn was one of our January debaters at Lolita Bar, up against former Salon.com sex columnist and author of I Love You, Let&#8217;s Meet, Virginia Vitzthum.] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
